Emily Ratajkowski Nude (1 Photo)

Emily Ratajkowski thanks her 10 million followers in the tub – Instagram, 12/28/2016. Emily Ratajkowski is an American model and actress. Age: 25 (born June 7, 1991).

Instagram: http://instagram.com/emrata
Twitter: https://twitter.com/emrata

Emily Ratajkowski Nude

English English (Canada) Español (Colombia) Deutsch Español Français English (UK) Italiano Português Русский English (US)

Comments

    1. President Erect

      We can't all be an Adonis like you are, I'm sure, but what exactly is wrong with her face? Those big brown eyes and naturally plump lips aren't part of what I would describe as a butterface.

      Reply
      1. Turlough

        Yeah, this whole 'butterface' meme regarding her is one of the weirdest things I've ever heard. I think, apart from the amazing body, she's incredibly beautiful. I just don't get the accusation she's plain at all. She's stunning from head to toe.

        Reply
        1. BeautyJuror

          Sorry, but I have to disagree, her face is simply not pretty. It's not about any individual part (although I dislike eyebrows like hers or Cara Delevingne's, who doesn't have a pretty face either, by the way), but overall something is just off and it looks a little weird. Just not cute weird like, for example, Emma Stone.

          And given the number of people in the butterface faction across the internet, maybe it is just a hate it or love it thing. What I don't like is people pretending that saying Rata does not have a nice face is equivalent to a preposterous claim like saying Scarlett Johansson does not have a beautiful face.

          Whatever, about her tits there can be no discussion.

          Nonetheless: props for the nickname President Erect!!!

          Reply
  1. lastfurlong

    She is a butterface. A butterface with an awesome body, but a butterface for sure.

    I know some people find Lucy Collett sexy, while I find her repugnant, disgusting and fat. But there is no discussion whether she is fat or not, just whether you like that or not.

    So, just be honest and say that as long as the body is hot, you don't care what the face looks like (instead of trying to make yourself feel better about yourself by claiming her face is "beautiful" and trying to label those who disagree as idiots).

    Reply
    1. LastFurlongISAnIdiot

      I don't think she is "beautiful" but neither is she a "butterface." Why does it have to be one or the other? And comparing beauty (which is in the eye of the beholder) to something measurable, like how fat someone is, is beyond idiotic, so anyone who compares the two, like you just did, can safely be called an idiot.

      Reply
  2. LordFartleroy

    She should wear a bag with two holes on her face, not glasses. Save the see-through for your tits. That face is just an unwelcome distraction from her sizzling figure. I can't even stop thinking about her awesome tits! So blessed, it's all the more sad she was punished with a face like that.

    Reply
      1. officergoodbody

        It really depends on the dictionary. Rat Cow is in Webster's, Claudia Romain is in the Oxford English Dictionary, while Lake Bell is in the Cambridge Dictionary.

        So let's correct it: Rat Cow is a definition of a butterface.

        Reply
    1. Edward

      Maybe for you but not everyone finds the same type of faces attractive/unattractive. I've never understood the hype about Cameron Diaz. Each to their own.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Turlough Cancel reply